Archive for November, 2009

MC #84: New Moon, The Blind Side, Yes Men Fix The World

Posted by Andrew On November - 29 - 2009

MovieChatterAfter a Thanksgiving break, Andrew and Morgan are back and it's time to thrown down!  First they take a look at a new documentary, The Yes Men Fix The World.  Then, Andrew talks about whether or not The Blind Side is as racist as its trailer.  But things really start cooking when it's time to discuss the latest installment in the Twilight saga, New Moon, and they conclude that not only is it a bad film, but it's just plain evil.  As in, deeply misogynistic and morally wrong.  Tune in to find out why!  Also includes QuickChatter reviews and DVD Recommendations.

Click below the break for trailers and detailed show notes.


MC #84: New Moon, The Blind Side, Yes Men Fix The World

Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Twilight Saga: New Moon review

Posted by Morgan On November - 28 - 2009

morganIf the Internet were a blindfolded kindergartener with a two by four and a lust for partially hydrogenated soybean oil, then New Moon, its stomach walls lined with the promise of cynical nectar and sarcastic sugars, is the Internet’s piñata bitch.

If you live on the internet, and if you’re any familiar of mine then stop denying it to yourself you XKCD-reading, stumble-uponing, monitor-light-paled denizen of our growing digital empire, you are honor-bound to despise this film. Even now you’re devising particularly biting tweets to assure your 32 followers that, no, you are not on Team Jacob or Team Edward because Twilight is chocked full of Gay.

However, if you’re go-against-the-flow me, you probably don’t give two This Is Its about a movie that is now more popular than the Lunar calendar event after which it is named. Instead, Lord Morgan finds his manly self impervious to the massive waves of homosexual that are apparently bombarding New Moon’s audience. Your redheaded overman is instead concerned with how little this movie actually has to try in order to be 50%-off-hookers popular. Such ravenouscity defines its fanbase that the words “taste” and “quality” bounce off its supplicants as harmlessly as STDs off of Gene Simmons, and the utter lack of pressure for anyone on the production to staff to make a “good” movie ruins the essence of filmmaking: creative growth.

But for those out there living beneath the Earth’s substrata, using Anne Rice novels to sound proof your cave walls and bombarding your mole ears with TNT re-runs of Angel and Buffy because you fear change, New Moon is based on the second entry in J.K. Rowling Jr.’s goth teen fantasy opus, Twilight. It’s about some hoe and her on-again, off-again relationship with a vamp dude for whom the phrases “brooding,” “tragic” and “glistening epidermis” have been made redundant. Then there’s this other dude who, from what I understand, was about as visible as a Key Grip in the first film that the hoe falls in love with in between Nosferatu fixes.

The characters cry and yell a lot, then the movie ends. 300 Million Billion dollar check, please.

Having never read the books (a term I only use grudgingly to works lacking literatudinal merit, but hey, at least people are reading), never seen the first movie or bothered to read any of the uncountable anti-Twihard blog posts on the subject of New Moon, I went into this a little apathetic. And honestly, New Moon’s not all that bad.

Hey, why’s my Facebook friend counter running backwards?

Really though, ignoring all the excess bile and stink of a million angry webcams crying out in terror, it’s just a boring, mostly average kind of movie. The first 30 minutes are okay because you’re trying to get a sense of the mythology, and stylistically the film really loves slow motion walking, coats and hair blowing in the wind and a lot of long shots of people looking sad. Which is, y’know, cute. Then the melo yelo drama fuel injector kicks in and I basically walk out feeling like a voluntary victim of the CW’s primetime block. All in all, it’s certainly nothing new in the realm of Really Pissing Annoying Stuff (RePAS), but I think most people are worried Twilight is a bad contribution to human culture. We’ve weathered RePAS the likes of Coldplay and NCIS, however, so I hardly think humanity is plummeting down a black hole.

What really bothered me is that for a movie that is, ostensibly, a gothic fantasy story involving vampires and angry big transforming puppies, there’s no blood sucking, very little violence and, quizzically, scant few shots of the Moon. The fantasy horror style is just some poor genre condom the film is donning to keep its tweeny ejaculate from getting in the face of a viewership that’s simply tired of the standard romance dreck.

Movie reviewers the world over have been trying to prove how cool they are by unilaterally despising this movie, but no one aside from you gorgeous individuals read movie reviews any way, and to be honest there were far, far worse films this year, mainly because those films had higher expectations. They were either a continuation of a beloved series (X-Men) or a reboot of something that used to be cool (Star Trek) or, God fricking forbid, a fresh idea (District 9).

Bluntly, the year that has seen the highest gross in movie ticket sales ever, to re-use a Morganism by popular demand, has been a big wet pile of suck. The above movies had invested in them the most important capital of any in film enjoyment, that of hope. I went into New Moon hopeless, and was, at times, not entirely disappointed, nor did I fall asleep as I did during Where The Wild Things Are or The Box. It may have left a bland taste in my mouth, but it was more flavorful than the week-old mayonnaise I’ve been swilling at the cinema all bloody year.

All that said, I feel like I’ve had to point out sexism in films a little more often this year than I’m used to (2012, The Ugly Truth, for starters), and here we go again. Perhaps it’s because I’ve finally gone all progressive and forward-thinkery enough that I’ve accepted the idea that women can not only arrange a spice rack but also build one, but New Moon makes me feel very sorry for the multiple generations of women who will grow up idealizing the relationship between hoe…I’m sorry, Bella, and Guy-Who-Should-Have-Stayed-Dead-After-Voldemort-Smoked-His-Pasty-White-Ass-In-HP4.

Bella’s entire character is defined by her lack of quote-un-quote masculine traits, her subservience to men and her inability to think for herself. She buys them food, apologizes for everything she does, has night terrors and hallucinations when her men leave (and they’re always the ones breaking up with her) and she has to stop their fights or sacrifice herself in their name. One man tells her she can’t be with the other, she has to ask another to change her into his brand of monster du jour, and they always kiss her, not her them.

Even the much celebrated pick-up truck she drives isn’t all that much of a mark of independence because when Jacob or Edward are in the car, they’re the one’s driving. I even applauded the movie for, at first, allowing Bella to move organically from one relationship to the next, movies being notorious for characters that get over relationshits instantly magically. Then, her break-up pains rapidly descend into psychotic delusions and an attempt to kill herself 2/3 of the way into the movie. Why? Because the men in her life ARE her life. Let me tell you, Ladies, for serious not for fake, you need to respect yourselves more than this movie tells you to.

Or I’ll go gay. I swear I will.

2.5/5 stars

DVD Peek: Lindelof & Cuse on Jughead

Posted by Erik On November - 25 - 2009

Courtesy of Buena Vista Home Entertainment. ©ABC Studios.

TC #55: Conspiracy

Posted by Brian On November - 24 - 2009

TechChatterThis week: Google, Windows, Cloud Computing, and Gunky Tar.


TC# 55: Conspiracy Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

FF #26: Final Countdown

Posted by Brian On November - 24 - 2009

Friendly FireThis Week: Jestr's back to discuss the CEVO and ESEA finals and we go over some maths and some email!


FF #26: Final Countdown
Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sneak Peek at LOST Season 5 DVD Deleted Scene

Posted by Erik On November - 23 - 2009


Courtesy of Buena Vista Home Entertainment. ©ABC Studios.

MC #83: 2012 and A Serious Man

Posted by Andrew On November - 20 - 2009

MovieChatterIn this episode, planet Earth goes boom!  Andrew and Morgan give their thoughts on Roland Emmerich's depiction of the Apocalypse in 2012.  Plus, Andrew takes a serious look at the new film from the Coen Brothers, A Serious Man.  Also includes QuickChatter reviews and DVD Recommendations.

Click below the break for trailers and detailed show notes.


MC #83: 2012 and A Serious Man

Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

MC #82: The End of Poverty? with Philippe Diaz

Posted by Andrew On November - 18 - 2009

MovieChatterIn this bonus episode, Andrew and Morgan discuss a new documentary that's beginning to expand across the country called The End of Poverty? Afterwards, you can listen to Andrew's full, unedited interview with award-winning producer and the director of the film, Philippe Diaz, as they discuss the process of making the film and the issue of global poverty.

Click below the break for more information on the film and a specific list of interview questions, along with timecodes for the episode.


MC #82: The End of Poverty? with Philippe Diaz

Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

2012 review

Posted by Morgan On November - 15 - 2009

morganRight out of the gate, I felt sorry for 2012. Poor bastard film that it is, not only being marred by the fact that most people who've seen its trailer have seen all the movie has going for it, not only is it based on something that ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN in three years, but to top it all off I sat in the first row, which made its special effects look so terrible that I had to rely on the "vibrant" storytelling and "rich" character development to enjoy the movie.

Har, dee har, dee har.

Based on an ancient Mayan prophecy that states that the world's mojo will run out on 12/21/12, 2012 concerns an out-of-work writer named Morg-err-Jackson Curtis (John Cusack), a Geologist whose name I forgot (Chiwetel Ejiofor), an angry politician of some kind (Oliver Platt), President Thomas Definitely-Notbama Wilson (Danny Glover) and Woody Harrelson as some crazy guy (Himself). They all have a lot of very dramatic scenes where the camera zooms in on their shocked faces, and some of them die, but you won't care which. Then the movie ends and you realize, yes, its been three flippin' hours since you sat your American posterior down, and the groove in the seat now looks suspiciously like moons having sex.

If there's a heavy weight offender, 2012's is completely misunderstanding what makes disasters scary. It's weirdly cagey about showing death, as a super market being swallowed into the Earth early on mysteriously has no casualties. But once people are dying by the tri-county loads and reduced to teeny tiny little CG ants prime for the squashin', planetary genocide becomes a-okay.

Did Titanic teach you people nothing? We want disaster deaths to be so personal, grisly and affecting that when we walk out of the theater all we can talk about is our favoritest. And that's the most dramatic reaction you can ask of us because, honestly, you're a disaster movie and the best you can offer us is some new variety or ilk of indiscriminate maiming. Any combination of kittens, chainsaws, body butter, Toyota Camrys and soup will do.

2012 also mistakes its audience for people who will be sucked into the judgment day drama, offering us scenes like the opening which involves the theft of the Mona Lisa just moments before TWO ZERO ONE TWO appears in gaudy blue, Verdana Ref on the screen. I'm sorry loves, but when the waters rise I'm not going to be bemoaning the death of human culture, I'm gonna be using that hoe as a flotation device.

While we're on the subject of things that do nothing for the movie, our central cast is peopled by dreadful cookie cutter sound-alikes whose entire development comes in a witty little joke they make shortly after they appear on screen. Here's one: "Yes, but my wife's fish curry is still terrible!" Oh, I see what you did there, your wife can't cook! Sir, I love your clever observations and wish to seek out a method to produce your children. Please, please don't die.

Speaking of making fun of women, this is the most curiously sexist movie since The Ugly Truth, which was itself the most sexist thing since the invention of Republicans (ba-zinga!). All the men constantly group together to stare and drool at the ensuing havoc so that they can all agree on the exact phrasing of "Fuck if I know," and all the women are constantly pictured protecting children and crying a lot. Amanda Peet, the female lead's, big dramatic monologue begins with "As a mother," because women aren't really people, they're baby ovens. What, you didn't know? Get preggers now, ladies, or John Cusack will never love you.

Not that you'll care what anyone's saying or doing because every actor is here for their paycheck and no one seems to be having any fun with their role save Oliver Platt. Platt has always been comfortable in any role showcasing his rotund smarmyness, and his snorts of disapproval alone are more alive than the reanimated zombie goon squad he's forced to surround himself with, disguised though they are as “actors.”

We've long exited the age where computer animation continues to impress us, especially when YouTube gives us regular access to real life disasters, and while one might be able to enjoy, say, Transforminators El Secundo for its incredibly sexy, 23 year old, brunette...err...wit as opposed to its speshul effex, 2012's only draw is its over-the-toppery. While there are moments of tension from time to time, those moments are mainly achieved by increasing the bass and volume with each action scene, and by the time you're 45 minutes in it doesn't work anymore and none of us are watching the main characters thinking "Oh noes, they're going to get dry-humped by Death!"

Thinking back, I remember a similar experiment by 2012 director Roland Emmerich titled The Day After Tomorrow, which worked a lot better for two reasons. One, 2012 is a name and a gimmick to cash in on, whereas TDAT was just an event that happened to occur, and was made more threatening by not even having a name. The world wasn't breaking, it was just bending suddenly and violently. And two, TDAT's pay-off was, and still is, peerless and relevant, in that you realize by film's end that the majority of the disaster occurs to America and the once and former superpower must turn to the mercies of the rest of the world, which is a Twilight Zone-caliber scary-ass prospect.

But much like pulling out the magnification slider on GoogleMaps, 2012 reduces the minutiae and relevancy of life to a gaggle of pixels here and there and the tectonic bifurcation of Mozambique is met with a shrug. The final scene, which to avoid spoilers I'll only say involves Mt. Everest and the phrase "we're going to crash into it," is when we'd like the movie, and billions of human lives, to just go ahead and end already.

Instead, the best that can be said about 2012 is that it stayed as far away from ancient Mayan astrological hoohah as possible, so way to suck less, 2012. Way to.

1/5 stars

MC #81: The Box, The Fourth Kind, The Men Who Stare At Goats

Posted by Andrew On November - 12 - 2009

MovieChatterIn this "epic-sode," Andrew and Morgan grapple with human nature in their discussion of The Box. Plus, they also discuss alien abductions in The Fourth Kind and psychic soldiers in The Men Who Stare At Goats! Also includes QuickChatter reviews of Ong-Bak 2, Hump Day, and Good Hair, and DVD Recommendations.

Click below the break for trailers and detailed show notes.


MC #81: The Box, The Fourth Kind, The Men Who Stare At Goats

Download MP3Subscribe via iTunesSubscribe via Email

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Read the rest of this entry »

RQRM #5: Year One

Posted by Erik
Oct-12-2009 I Comments Off

RQRM #4: The Final Destination

Posted by Erik
Oct-12-2009 I Comments Off

RQRM #3: Surrogates

Posted by Erik
Oct-4-2009 I Comments Off

RQRM #2: The Informant

Posted by Erik
Sep-29-2009 I Comments Off

RQRM #1: Fame

Posted by Erik
Sep-29-2009 I Comments Off